A Level Gaze

"What effect must it have on a nation if it learns no foreign languages? Probably much the same as that which a total withdrawal from society has upon an individual."
--G.C. Lichtenberg



Links


New Email Address! levelgaze@gmail.com

Blogs

NoWarBlog

The Lefty Directory

The Agonist
aintnobaddude
alicublog
Alas, a Blog
Altercation
Ambivalent Imbroglio
AmericaBlog
American Street
Amygdala
Anger Management
Angry Bear
Armed Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Barney Gumble
Bartcop
Beyond Corporate
Billmon
Blah3
Body and Soul
Booman Tribune
Brad DeLong
Busy Busy Busy
Buzzflash
By Neddie Jingo
Calculated Risk
CalPundit
Chase me ladies
Chris Nelson
Contested Terrrain
Cooped Up
Conceptual Guerilla
corrente
Counterspin
Crooked Timber
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Decembrist
Demosthenes
Driftglass
D-Squared Digest
Electrolite
Eschaton
Ethel
Ezra Klein
Fafblog!
Fanatical Apathy
Firedoglake
First Draft
Fistful of Euros
get donkey!
Globblog
The Hamster
Here's What's Left
Horowitz Watch
Housing Bubble
Hullabaloo
Intl News
Istanblog
James Wolcott
Jesus' General
Juan Cole
Junius
Lean Left
Left Coast Breakdown
Letter from Gotham
Liberal Oasis
MacDiva
MadKane
Mahablog
Majikthise
Making Light
Marginal Revolution
Mark Kleiman
Matthew Yglesias
MaxSpeak
Media Whores Online
Michael Finley
Michael Froomkin
MyDD
My Left Wing Nathan Newman
Off the Kuff
Oliver Willis
Orcinus
Pandagon
Pen-Elayne
Pfaffenblog
PLA
The Poor Man
R.B. Ham
Raed in the Middle
Ragout
Raw Story
ReachM High Cowboy
Rittenhouse Review
The Road to Surfdom
Roger Ailes
Rude Pundit
Ruminate This
Seeing the Forest
Seize the Fish
Self Made Pundit
Sideshow
Sirotablog
Sisyphus Shrugged
Skippy
Slacktivist
South Knox Bubba
Steve Gilliard
Talking Points Memo
Talk Left
The Talking Dog
Tapped
TBogg
Ted Barlow
Testify!
Thinking It Through
Through the Looking Glass
TNR Online
Tres Producers
TRR
Two Tears in a Bucket
uggabugga
Unknown News
Vaara
Wampum
War Liberal
Winning Argument
Wonkette
WTF Is It Now


General Interest

BBC News
The Economist
Metafilter
RealPolitik
Robot Wisdom



Bob. A damn fine comic.

Archives


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Thursday, February 20, 2003
 
A serious question

If Iraq can be made a beacon of democracy, why can't Afghanistan?

No, really. We went in and changed the regime. What did we change it to?

Why didn't we make it democratic and enlightened? Are the people there too primitive? Is the history too complicated, the factions too long embittered? Are there irreconcilable religious or ethnic differences?

Why isn't Afghanistan suitable for improvement if we are so sure it's such an easy job in Iraq? I'd really like to know.


Sunday, February 16, 2003
 
US to punish German 'treachery'

It looks like Donald Rumsfeld has found a new blockbuster to add to the all-star cavalcade of monumental thickheadedness that has become U.S. foreign policy:

The US will withdraw all its troops and bases from there and end military and industrial co-operation between the two countries - moves that could cost the Germans billions of euros.

The plan - discussed by Pentagon officials and military chiefs last week on the orders of Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld - is designed 'to harm' the German economy to make an example of the country for what US hawks see as Chancellor Gerhard Schröder's 'treachery'.


While the rationale for having troops in Germany has dried up and blown away with the demise of the Iron Curtain, redeploying our forces, to say nothing of withdrawing our diplomatic affinity, as a public slap in the face is stupefying.

Say it with me: we're going to punish a country that refuses to go along with a war that we can't even convincingly justify. This is intelligent? This is sane?

Is this the dawn of a new doctrine? Are all of our initiatives to be constructed according to the 'all stick, no carrot' model?

The Bush administration stepped back from its initial unilateralist stance against Iraq and took the position that it would abide by (or at least consider) the decision of the UN Security Council. Since then, it has articulated a number of variously specious and disingenuous arguments to sway their position. Fair (if despicable) enough. Now we're attempting to fix the vote through intimidation? This from the world's beacon of democracy?

This brings to mind Lawrence Kohlberg's theory of stages of morality, in which he posits a sequence of successively more sophisticated levels of morality through which we advance as we get older and learn more about the world. While many people never reach the highest stage, nearly everyone manages to get past the first stage. Except for Rumsfeld:

Stage 1 -- Punishment and obedience orientation (Preconventional)
In this stage, rules of conduct derive their force from the power figures who back them. The primary focus is on avoiding punishment. Rules are looked at as concrete, prohibitory, and not universally applicable. There's also no sense that the rules are necessary for maintaining greater social order.


via Atrios


Saturday, February 15, 2003
 
Regime Change - What is it Good For?

The idea of “regime change:” exactly what, relative to the current state of affairs, do the warmongers expect to accomplish by it?

At the moment, Iraq is, de facto, in a state of surrender. We now have near-total military control over 2/3 of the country, and prohibitive air superiority over the rest. Upon very short notice, we’ll be able to bring to bear enough force to utterly preempt any Iraqi military initiatives. We have sanctions in place that severely restrict the flow of money and goods into the country. We have weapons inspectors on the ground, who have complete freedom of movement, and who override Iraqi sovereignty at whim.

Saddam is cooperating, however reluctantly, with the UN. Why? Because he doesn’t want war. Any untoward action on his part will immediately be used as justification to remove him. It is therefore unimaginable that he will undertake aggressive actions against anyone.

What changes will a war, and presumed regime change effect?

Aside from inevitable death and destruction, there is the prospect of liberation for many Iraqis. There is the prospect of suffering for many more, especially the Kurds. Given the lack of unanimity among opposition groups on the subject of invasion, there is only uncertainty as to whether the people will benefit.

The one sure result of regime change is U.S. control of Iraqi land and resources. That is the only thing that can be accomplished by means of war and nothing else. Let’s stop kidding ourselves by pretending otherwise.


Thursday, February 13, 2003
 
Robert Byrd gave an impassioned speech on the floor of the Senate yesterday. He may be an ex-klansman, but the speech could have been written by Joe Conason. Byrd could well be the last real statesman left in the USA.

One can understand the anger and shock of any President after the savage attacks of September 11. One can appreciate the frustration of having only a shadow to chase and an amorphous, fleeting enemy on which it is nearly impossible to exact retribution.

But to turn one's frustration and anger into the kind of extremely destabilizing and dangerous foreign policy debacle that the world is currently witnessing is inexcusable from any Administration charged with the awesome power and responsibility of guiding the destiny of the greatest superpower on the planet. Frankly many of the pronouncements made by this Administration are outrageous. There is no other word.


Go read it now.