A Level Gaze |
|
"What effect must it have on a nation if it learns no foreign languages? Probably much the same as that which a total withdrawal from society has upon an individual." --G.C. Lichtenberg LinksNew Email Address! levelgaze@gmail.com Blogs NoWarBlog The Lefty Directory The Agonist aintnobaddude alicublog Alas, a Blog Altercation Ambivalent Imbroglio AmericaBlog American Street Amygdala Anger Management Angry Bear Armed Liberal Bad Attitudes Barney Gumble Bartcop Beyond Corporate Billmon Blah3 Body and Soul Booman Tribune Brad DeLong Busy Busy Busy Buzzflash By Neddie Jingo Calculated Risk CalPundit Chase me ladies Chris Nelson Contested Terrrain Cooped Up Conceptual Guerilla corrente Counterspin Crooked Timber Daily Howler Daily Kos Decembrist Demosthenes Driftglass D-Squared Digest Electrolite Eschaton Ethel Ezra Klein Fafblog! Fanatical Apathy Firedoglake First Draft Fistful of Euros get donkey! Globblog The Hamster Here's What's Left Horowitz Watch Housing Bubble Hullabaloo Intl News Istanblog James Wolcott Jesus' General Juan Cole Junius Lean Left Left Coast Breakdown Letter from Gotham Liberal Oasis MacDiva MadKane Mahablog Majikthise Making Light Marginal Revolution Mark Kleiman Matthew Yglesias MaxSpeak Media Whores Online Michael Finley Michael Froomkin MyDD My Left Wing Nathan Newman Off the Kuff Oliver Willis Orcinus Pandagon Pen-Elayne Pfaffenblog PLA The Poor Man R.B. Ham Raed in the Middle Ragout Raw Story ReachM High Cowboy Rittenhouse Review The Road to Surfdom Roger Ailes Rude Pundit Ruminate This Seeing the Forest Seize the Fish Self Made Pundit Sideshow Sirotablog Sisyphus Shrugged Skippy Slacktivist South Knox Bubba Steve Gilliard Talking Points Memo Talk Left The Talking Dog Tapped TBogg Ted Barlow Testify! Thinking It Through Through the Looking Glass TNR Online Tres Producers TRR Two Tears in a Bucket uggabugga Unknown News Vaara Wampum War Liberal Winning Argument Wonkette WTF Is It Now General Interest BBC News The Economist Metafilter RealPolitik Robot Wisdom ![]() ![]() Archives ![]() |
Thursday, March 04, 2004
Shadow Government Ezra Klein of Pandagon has an intriguing idea about how to keep the media focused on Bush & Co.'s, er, shortcomings: form a shadow government. Name a VP soon, and a "cabinet" in June. Each member of the shadow cabinet would comment on Bush administration actions and proposals in his/her area, point up shortcomings and contradictions, and put forward what a Kerry administration would do instead. The press would eat it up, and the nation would benefit from a democratic counterpoint on every issue. I only see one major problem with this approach, and it could prove a deal-breaker: it's an awful lot of cats to herd. All the participants have to be lined up ahead of time and commit to making themselves available to serve in a Kerry administration. They would have to abandon government positions and careers in exchange for tenuous futures. Further, the scheme would greatly telescope the usual vetting process. If a member of the shadow cabinet were to say something out of tune with the rest of Kerry's platform, the republicans are sure to jump all over it and say that Kerry can't manage people and isn't fit to govern. If their collective message is to be effective, Kerry has to come up with concrete, detailed policies for each department in a very big hurry. Then he has to get each of the participants to sign onto the program, even and especially where it conflicts with his/her own position. Should Bush win, these people will have undermined their credibility for nothing. If there are perceived differences among the "cabinet," the press will find itself with an irresistible drama to follow that can only help Bush's cause. As prospective cabinet members, participants' backgrounds and character would be fair game for the other side, which could target them at leisure, unconstrained by the rules and decorum of the Senate chamber. Anything the slime machine came up with on these people would stick to Kerry, before the election. Instead of a shadow government, Kerry should round up 3 or 4 high-profile Democrats as "official spokesmen," one for foreign policy, one for budgetary issues, one for labor issues, etc. They'd be perceived in much the same way as shadow cabinet members, and receive nearly as much press coverage, without giving the other side such a big target to shoot at. |